Inner Forth Stakeholder Workshop

Peer-reviewed publications

What are shared and social values?

  • Kenter, J.O., O’Brien, L., Hockley, N., Ravenscroft, N., Fazey, I., Irvine, K.N., Reed, M.S., Christie, M., Brady, E., Bryce, R., Church, A., Cooper, N., Davies, A., Evely, A., Everard, M., Fish, R., Fisher, J.A., Jobstvogt, N., Molloy, C., Orchard-Webb, J., Ranger, S., Ryan, M., Watson, V., Williams, S., 2015. What are shared and social values of ecosystems? Ecological Economics 111, 86–99.

Special issue on Shared, Plural and Cultural Values in Ecosystem Services

Watch a seminar summarising the Issue (50 mins) | Download seminar slides (pdf)

  • Kenter, J.O. 2016. Shared, plural and cultural values. Ecosystem Services 21, 175-183.
  • Irvine, K., O’Brien, L., Ravenscroft, N., Cooper, N., Everard, M., Fazey, I., Reed, M., Kenter, J.O. 2016. Ecosystem services and the idea of shared values. Ecosystem Services 21, 184-193.
  • Kenter, J.O., Reed, M., Fazey, I. 2016. The Deliberative Value Formation model. Ecosystem Services 21, 208-217.
  • Fish, R., Church, A., Winter, M. Conceptualising cultural ecosystem services: a novel framework for research and critical engagement. Ecosystem Services 21, 218-229.
  • Cooper, N., Brady, E., Bryce, R., Steen, H. 2016. Aesthetic and spiritual values of ecosystems: recognising the ontological and axiological plurality of cultural ecosystem ‘services’. Ecosystem Services 21, 218-229.
  • Everard, M., Reed, M.S., Kenter, J.O., 2016. The ripple effect: institutionalising pro-environmental values to shift societal norms and behaviours. Ecosystem Services 21, 230-240.
  • Raymond, C., Kenter, J.O. 2016. Transcendental values and the valuation and management of ecosystem services. Ecosystem Services 21, 241-257.
  • Bryce, R., Irvine, K., Church, A., Fish, R., Ranger, S., Kenter, J.O. 2016. Subjective well-being indicators for large-scale assessment of cultural ecosystem services. Ecosystem Services 21, 258-269.
  • Kenter, J.O., Jobstvogt, N., Watson, V., Irvine, K., Christie, M., Bryce, R. 2016. The impact of information, value-deliberation and group-based decision-making on values for ecosystem services: integrating deliberative monetary valuation and storytelling. Ecosystem Services 21, 270-290.
  • Kenter, J.O. 2016. Integrating deliberative choice experiments, systems modelling and participatory mapping to assess shared values of ecosystem services. Ecosystem Services 21, 291-307.
  • Orchard-Webb, J., Kenter, J.O., Bryce, R., Church, A. 2016. Deliberative Democratic Monetary Valuation to implement the Ecosystem Approach. Ecosystem Services 21, 308-318.​1016/​j.​ecoser.​2016.​09.​005
  • Edwards, D., Collins, T., Goto, R. 2016. An arts-led dialogue to elicit shared, plural and cultural values of ecosystems. Ecosystem Services 21, 319-328.
  • Fish, R., Church, A., Willis, C., Winter, M., Tratalos, J.W., Haines-Young, R., Potschin, M. 2016. Making space for cultural ecosystem services: insights from a study of the UK Nature Improvement Initiative. Ecosystem Services 21, 329-343. 10.1016/j.ecoser.2016.09.017
  • Ranger, S., Kenter, J.O., Bryce, R., Cumming, G., Dapling, T., Lawes, E., Richardson, P. 2016. Forming shared values in conservation management: an interpretive-deliberative-democratic approach to including community voices. Ecosystem Services 21, 344-357.
  • Kenter, J.O., Reed, M. S., Irvine, K.N., O’Brien, E., Bryce, R., Christie, M., Cooper, N., Hockley, N., Fazey, I., Orchard-Webb, J., Ravenscroft, N., Raymond, C.M., Tett, P., Watson, V. 2016. Shared values and deliberative valuation: Future directions. Ecosystem Services 21, 358-371.

UK National Ecosystem Assessment peer-reviewed reports

  • UK National Ecosystem Assessment, 2014. UK National Ecosystem Assessment follow-on phase: Synthesis Report. UNEP-WCMC, Cambridge.
  • Church, A., Fish, R., Haines-Young, R., Mourato, S., Tratalos, J., Stapleton, L., Willis, C., Coates, P., Gibbons, S., Leyshon, C., Potschin, M., Ravenscroft, N., Sanchis-Guarner, R., Winter, M., Kenter, J.O., 2014. UK National Ecosystem Assessment Follow-on. Work package report 5: Cultural ecosystem services and indicators. UNEP-WCMC, Cambridge.
  • Kenter, J.O., Reed, M.S., Irvine, K.N., O’Brien, L., Brady, E., Bryce, R., Christie, M., Church, A., Cooper, N., Davies, A., Hockley, N., Fazey, I., Jobstvogt, N., Molloy, C., Orchard-Webb, J., Ravenscroft, N., Ryan, M., Watson, V., 2014. UK National Ecosystem Assessment follow-on phase. Work Package Report 6: Shared, plural and cultural values of ecosystems. UNEP-WCMC, Cambridge. / Summary version:

Other publications

  • Reed, M.S., Allen, K., Attlee, A., Dougill, A.J., Evans, K.L., Kenter, J.O., Hoy, J., McNab, D., Stead, S.M., Twyman, C., Scott, A.S., Smyth, M.A., Stringer, L.C., Whittingham, M.J., 2017. A place-based approach to payments for ecosystem services. Global Environmental Change 43, 92–106.
  • Raymond, C.M., Kenter, J.O., Plieninger, T., Turner, N.J., Alexander, K.A., 2014. Comparing instrumental and deliberative paradigms underpinning the assessment of social values for cultural ecosystem services. Ecological Economics 107, 145–156.
  • Kenter, J.O., Hyde, T., Christie, M., Fazey, I., 2011. The importance of deliberation in valuing ecosystem services in developing countries—Evidence from the Solomon Islands. Global Environmental Change 21, 505–521.